Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, having a score of 81.9 against 79.4. The Google Pixel 4 body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it's notably lighter. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh. Galaxy A35 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.