Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A41, getting an 81.9 score against 81.7. The Google Pixel 4 design is just a bit heavier and a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A41. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 has a bit better display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel amount per screen inch. Galaxy A41 features much more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A41 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A41 has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.