Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4, getting a global score of 83.8 against 81.9. Although the Galaxy A50 and Google Pixel 4 were released only 7 months apart, the Galaxy A50 design is a bit thinner but a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.