Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4's overall score of 81.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50s and the Google Pixel 4 were released with only a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A50s design is a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than the Google Pixel 4.
The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A50s. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.