Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Google Pixel 4, with a 90.8 score against 81.9. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G design is a little thicker and heavier than the Google Pixel 4. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy A51 5G takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G and the Google Pixel 4 cost the same, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.