Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than the Google Pixel 4, with a 90.7 score against 81.9. Although Galaxy A52 is newer than the Google Pixel 4, it is just a bit thicker and heavier. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 4 features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. The Galaxy A52 has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB and more internal memory.
The Galaxy A52 features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger sensor capturing much better quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.