Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Google Pixel 4, with a global score of 91.3 against 81.9. Even though the Galaxy A52 5G is newer than Google Pixel 4, it is just a bit thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 4 has a little better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much better resolution camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.