Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4's 81.9 overall score. Although Galaxy A52s is newer than Google Pixel 4, it's just a little thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit higher screen density.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A52s. They have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A52s has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61 percent larger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A52s shoots way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a much larger camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.