Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. Google Pixel 4's body weights the same than the Samsung Galaxy A6, but it's a little thicker. Google Pixel 4 has a more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a much better 1080 x 2280 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a much greater pixels density. Galaxy A6 has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 400 GB.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less MP resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a way better (4K) video quality. The Galaxy A6 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A6, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.