Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A70, having an 81.9 score against 76.9. Even though the Google Pixel 4 and Galaxy A70 were only released with a couple months difference, Google Pixel 4's design is somewhat lighter but just a little bit thicker than Galaxy A70. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount per display inch. Google Pixel 4 features a much better camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 is a little more expensive than Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.