Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4, getting an 87.5 score against 81.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A71 and Google Pixel 4 were released only a couple months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A71 body is a little heavier but just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 4. Google Pixel 4 features a little sharper display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount in each inch of display.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a way more MP back facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy A71 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Galaxy A71 costs more than the Google Pixel 4, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.