Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C7, with a global score of 81.9 against 77.7. Google Pixel 4 is a a lot newer and just a little lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy C7, although it's thicker. The Google Pixel 4 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 4 also has a little bit better pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px. The Galaxy C7 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy C7 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 128 GB.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light images and videos and a way better (4K) video definition. Galaxy C7 features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.