Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4's 81.9 overall score. Galaxy F62's body is newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than Google Pixel 4. Google Pixel 4 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy F62 and Google Pixel 4 both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy F62 has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. The Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos and a lot better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.