Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 4's global score of 81.9. Although the Galaxy Fold and Google Pixel 4 were released only 1 months apart, the Galaxy Fold body is thinner but heavier than Google Pixel 4. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Fold features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, and they both have a same size sensor, the Galaxy Fold also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 56 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 4, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.