Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-06-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's score of 76.1. The Google Pixel 4 is a just a little lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, but they are 0.32inches thick. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 4 also has a just a little greater pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels. The Galaxy J7 Max counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Google Pixel 4 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a back camera with less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a way higher video quality. Galaxy J7 Max has improved battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 18 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.