Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-06-28 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Galaxy J8, getting a score of 81.9 against 76.7. Google Pixel 4's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy J8, but it is just a little lighter. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy J8, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better screen density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy J8 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy J8 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy J8 counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a much higher video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.