Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-03-18 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, blue and white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | PLS |
| 443 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy M12's overall score of 80. The Google Pixel 4 is an older device than the Galaxy M12, but it is somewhat thinner and notably lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 has a much better display than Galaxy M12, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixels quantity per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px. Galaxy M12 counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy M12 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy M12 takes slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy M12 counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.