Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M20's global score of 78.9. The Google Pixel 4 is a a little thinner and lighter phone than Galaxy M20, even though both of them were released with only 9 months difference. Google Pixel 4 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel number per inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a worse 12.2 MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy M20 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M20 has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.