Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 443 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4's global score of 81.9. Samsung Galaxy M51's construction is newer than the Google Pixel 4's, although it's somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 4 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. Galaxy M51 has much more memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. Galaxy M51 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.