Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Google Pixel 4, with a 98.9 score against 81.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much heavier phone than Google Pixel 4, but they are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite greater pixels density and a bigger screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera, a lot higher video resolution and a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.