Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. Google Pixel 4's design is newer and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, but it is just a bit thicker. The Galaxy Note 5 features a much better display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a little bit higher pixels count per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a tinier sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 and Google Pixel 4 have really similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 5 has a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Google Pixel 4 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.