Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 global score. The Google Pixel 4 construction is newer and a little bit lighter, but a bit thicker than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a little greater display density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.