Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4, with a general score of 89 against 81.9. The Galaxy Note10 design is just a bit heavier but just a little thinner than the Google Pixel 4, and both were only released 2 months apart. Galaxy Note10's processor is very similar to the CPU in Google Pixel 4, and although the Galaxy Note10 has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 4 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2280 resolution, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels in each inch of display. Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a worse resolution camera and a lower (4K) video quality, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 4, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.