Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note3's global score of 77.7. The Google Pixel 4 design is extremely newer, just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Galaxy Note3. Google Pixel 4 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 4 also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a just a bit higher pixel amount in each inch of screen.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4 takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy Note3 features a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note3 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 64 GB. Galaxy Note3 has a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.