Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2015-08-21 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note5's 80.2 overall score. Although the Google Pixel 4 is just a little thicker than the Galaxy Note5, it's just a little bit lighter and extremely newer. The Galaxy Note5 has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Note5 also has a little more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy Note5 features as much storage capacity for applications and games as the Google Pixel 4 one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 takes slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in low-light environments and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy Note5 also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy Note5 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.