Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-08-02 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note7, with an 81.9 score against 79.5. Google Pixel 4's design is a lot newer and just a little bit lighter, but a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note7. The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a quite better pixels density. The Google Pixel 4 takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a better 12.2 megapixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy Note7 counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.