Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Google Pixel 4, getting a general score of 98 against 81.9. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is way heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Google Pixel 4. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a just a bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen, a larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher 108 MP resolution back-facing camera, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 4, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.