Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Google Pixel 4, getting a 95.4 score against 81.9. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is notably newer than the Google Pixel 4's, but it's much heavier and a little thicker. Google Pixel 4 features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a brighter display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 108 MP resolution, a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 4. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 4, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.