Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | -- |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.71 ounces | -- |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Google Pixel 4, having a global score of 90.7 against 81.9. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is thinner and notably lighter than Google Pixel 4. The Google Pixel 4 features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a little greater display density and a bigger screen. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much better 200 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.