Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7's 79.5 general score. The Google Pixel 4 design is much newer, but a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than the Galaxy S7. The Galaxy S7 counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher number of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S7 counts with more storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 200 GB. Google Pixel 4 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a camera that's just as good as Google Pixel 4's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy S7 has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% more battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S7. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy S7, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.