Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The Google Pixel 4 body is much newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM and more processing cores.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 200 GB.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also has a more mega pixels back facing camera.
Google Pixel 4 is more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.