Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7 edge's score of 78.1. The Google Pixel 4 is a notably newer device than the Galaxy S7 edge, although it is a little bit thicker and a little heavier. The Galaxy S7 edge features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy S7 edge features a better memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 200 GB. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's camera is very similar to the Google Pixel 4 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a worse video quality and a worse 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
Galaxy S7 edge has improved battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit more expensive than the Galaxy S7 edge, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.