Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a general score of 81.9 against 77.6. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 4 is noticeably older than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. The Google Pixel 4 has a really superior performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels per screen inch. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way lower 12.2 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 45 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.