Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 81.9 score against 81. Google Pixel 4 is a notably lighter and thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even though both were released only a couple months apart. Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a camera that's just as good as Google Pixel 4's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a lot smaller camera sensor taking lot lower quality photographs, and they both have the same camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, it also counts with a camera with a way better 25 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.