Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4's global score of 81.9. Even though Galaxy Z Flip and Google Pixel 4 were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy Z Flip's design is somewhat heavier but also thinner. The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Flip shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, although it has a back camera with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, a worse video resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Galaxy Z Flip features a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.