Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4's 81.9 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is heavier than Google Pixel 4, it's thinner and newer. Google Pixel 4 features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 and Google Pixel 4 have extremely similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 4 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video and a camera in the back with a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.