Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Google Pixel 4, having a 92.3 score against 81.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is newer and somewhat thinner than the Google Pixel 4's, although it is also heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4, although it has a lower video quality, a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting pictures in low light situations, they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.