Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 4's general score of 81.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is newer and thinner than Google Pixel 4's, but it is also extremely heavier. Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a lower video definition, a lower resolution back camera and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 4, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.