Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Google Pixel 4, having a global score of 90.6 against 81.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and extremely thinner phone than the Google Pixel 4, but it is heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with more mega pixels and a lot bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.