Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Xperia Z4v, having a global score of 81.9 against 78.8. The Google Pixel 4 construction is a lot newer and just a little thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Xperia Z4v. Xperia Z4v has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a greater screen pixels density.
Sony Xperia Z4v has a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 128 GB. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
The Xperia Z4v has a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% larger battery size. The Xperia Z4v captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a much higher resolution camera and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is more expensive than the Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xperia Z4v. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xperia Z4v, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.