Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, with a general score of 81.9 against 76.1. The Google Pixel 4 body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than TCL 20 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels count in each display inch.
Google Pixel 4 has a little faster processing unit than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. TCL 20 Pro 5G takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photos and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.