Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-04-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than Xiaomi Black Shark, getting a general score of 81.9 against 80.4. Google Pixel 4's construction is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark. The Google Pixel 4 and the Xiaomi Black Shark feature extremely similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Black Shark has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2800mAh. Xiaomi Black Shark has a camera that's just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 4, although the Xiaomi Black Shark has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, a worse video quality, a lesser MP camera in the back and a smaller diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.