Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-10-13 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, with a score of 81.9 against 81.2. The Google Pixel 4 body is incredibly lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, despite of the fact that it was released a little bit further than a year before. Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's memory for games and applications is just as good as the Google Pixel 4 one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 72 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.