Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-04-15 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, getting an 81.9 score against 81.4. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4 construction is a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a little lower amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 10 percent more battery size. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.