Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with an 81.9 score against 78.7. Google Pixel 4 is a a bit thinner and extremely lighter phone than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, even though both of them were only released with a couple months difference. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.