Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, getting an 81.9 score against 79.3. The Google Pixel 4 is a way lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Poco X2, even though both of them were only released 4 months apart. Google Pixel 4 features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X2. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little better display density. The Xiaomi Poco X2 and Google Pixel 4 count with similar storage for apps and games, they have the same 64 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 captures a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a way larger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.