Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having an 81.9 score against 78.2. Although Google Pixel 4 is older than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, it's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.