Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, with a overall score of 81.9 against 78.2. Google Pixel 4 is an older device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but it is just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit bigger display.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's storage capacity for applications and games is very similar to the Google Pixel 4 one, both of them have equal internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a way lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light situations.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you want to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.