Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | -- |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a general score of 86.1, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 score. Although it's the best in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's construction is just a bit thicker and much heavier than the Google Pixel 4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a larger display, a lot better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels and a little better pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 84 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.