Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | -- |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a global score of 81.9 against 77.1. The Google Pixel 4 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but both have the same thickness. The Google Pixel 4 has a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a better display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a bigger screen, a lot higher 2080 x 2400px resolution and a little higher pixels quantity per screen inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.